Framboos Siroop vs Karvan Cévitam Citroen
Overall, Framboos Siroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Framboos Siroop | Karvan Cévitam Citroen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 10 kcal | 294 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 72 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Framboos Siroop has 97% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 294 kcal).
- Framboos Siroop has 97% less sugar (2.5 g vs 72 g).
- Framboos Siroop has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Framboos Siroop
Water, suiker, siroop met framboos en appel, gezoet met suikers en zoetstoffen. ma's conserveermiddelen: kaliumsorbaat, natriumbenzoaat; zoetstoffen: acesulfam 5% vruchtensap uit concentraat (50% framboos, 50% appel), voedingszuur c hummiddel: mono - en diglyceriden van vetzuren*. *van plantaardige oorsprong consumeren.
Karvan Cévitam Citroen
Sap uit vruchtensapconcentraat 75% (appel, citroen 33%), suiker, voedingszuur (citroenzuur), aroma's, vitaminen, conserveermiddelen (kaliumsorbaat, natriumbenzoaat).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Framboos Siroop or Karvan Cévitam Citroen?
Overall, Framboos Siroop has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Framboos Siroop has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 294 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Framboos Siroop has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 72 g per 100 g.