Triti Bel Pufarine vs Zahar brut
Overall, Triti Bel Pufarine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Triti Bel Pufarine | Zahar brut |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 2 |
| Calories | 383 kcal | 406 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 46 g | 99.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zahar brut has no fat, while Triti Bel Pufarine has 1.3 g.
- Triti Bel Pufarine has 54% less sugar (46 g vs 99.9 g).
- Triti Bel Pufarine has 100% more fiber (3.9 g vs 0 g).
- Triti Bel Pufarine has 98% more protein (6.3 g vs 0.1 g).
- Triti Bel Pufarine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Zahar brut is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Triti Bel Pufarine lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Triti Bel Pufarine
Tomates (148 g pour 100 g de Tomato Ketchup), vinaigre, sucre, sel, extraits d'épices et d'herbes (contiennent du céleri), épice.
Zahar brut
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Triti Bel Pufarine or Zahar brut?
Overall, Triti Bel Pufarine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Triti Bel Pufarine has fewer calories: 383 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Triti Bel Pufarine has less sugar: 46 g versus 99.9 g per 100 g.