Antonia cocoa vs Zahar brut
Overall, Antonia cocoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Antonia cocoa | Zahar brut |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 348 kcal | 406 kcal |
| Fat | 21.6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 11.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 99.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Antonia cocoa has 14% fewer calories (348 kcal vs 406 kcal).
- Zahar brut has no fat, while Antonia cocoa has 21.6 g.
- Zahar brut has no saturated fat, while Antonia cocoa has 11.3 g.
- Antonia cocoa has 97% less sugar (3.2 g vs 99.9 g).
- Antonia cocoa has 98% more protein (6.1 g vs 0.1 g).
- Antonia cocoa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Zahar brut is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Antonia cocoa lists: Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Antonia cocoa
Făină albă de grâu 650, zahar, grásime de palmier, apă, 6.8% pudra de cacao cu conţinut redus de grăsime*, agenţi de afânare: carbonat acid de amoniu, carbonat de sodiu sare iodată, arome. Poate conține urme de produse derivate din lapte, seminte de susan, soia.
Zahar brut
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Antonia cocoa or Zahar brut?
Overall, Antonia cocoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Antonia cocoa has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Antonia cocoa has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 99.9 g per 100 g.