Comparison

Tripes à la Provençale vs Haggis

Overall, Tripes à la Provençale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTripes à la ProvençaleHaggis
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 120 kcal 253 kcal
Fat 5.1 g 16.1 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 7.3 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.3 g
Salt 1 g 1.5 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 15 g 10.8 g
Additives20
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tripes à la Provençale has 53% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 253 kcal).
  • Tripes à la Provençale has 68% less fat (5.1 g vs 16.1 g).
  • Tripes à la Provençale has 81% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Tripes à la Provençale has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Tripes à la Provençale has 28% more protein (15 g vs 10.8 g).
  • Tripes à la Provençale has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Haggis is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Tripes à la Provençale lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
  • Only Haggis lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Tripes à la Provençale

Tripes et pieds désossés de bœuf 58,7%, sauce (bouillon, vin blanc (contient des sulfites), huile d'olive (2,3%), stabilisant : E1422, E412, concentré de tomates (1,1%), sel, épices et aromates, arômes naturels.

Haggis

Pork lungs (26%), oatmeal, water, beef heart (13%), beef liver (10%), lamb lungs (7%), beef heart (5%), dried onion, pearl barley, salt, spices (black pepper, pimento)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tripes à la Provençale or Haggis?

Overall, Tripes à la Provençale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tripes à la Provençale has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 253 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tripes à la Provençale has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons