Tripes à la provençale vs Tripes à la tomate
Overall, Tripes à la tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripes à la provençale | Tripes à la tomate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 107 kcal | 75 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tripes à la tomate has 30% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 107 kcal).
- Tripes à la tomate has 27% less fat (1.9 g vs 2.6 g).
- Tripes à la tomate has 53% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Tripes à la provençale has 13% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
Ingredients
Tripes à la provençale
Not available.
Tripes à la tomate
Tripes de bovins 52% (panses, bonnets, feuillets, caillettes de bovins en proportions naturelles), eau, pieds de bovins désossés 6%, oignons, carottes, tomates 1,7%, jus de tomate 0,7% acidifiant: acide citrique, affermissant chlorure de calcium, calvados, sel, arômes naturels, gélatine de porc, ail, épices, plantes aromatiques, colorant: caramel ordinaire. Traces éventuelles de céleri.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripes à la provençale or Tripes à la tomate?
Overall, Tripes à la tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tripes à la tomate has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 107 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tripes à la provençale has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.