Comparison

Tourte au riesling vs Tourte des Pyrénées aux pruneaux

Overall, Tourte au riesling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTourte au rieslingTourte des Pyrénées aux prun...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 283 kcal 401 kcal
Fat 18 g 18.3 g
Saturated fat 10 g 6.8 g
Sugars 0.9 g 27.9 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.3 g
Fiber — 2.8 g
Protein 12 g 5.6 g
Additives08
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tourte au riesling has 29% fewer calories (283 kcal vs 401 kcal).
  • Tourte des Pyrénées aux pruneaux has 32% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 10 g).
  • Tourte au riesling has 97% less sugar (0.9 g vs 27.9 g).
  • Tourte des Pyrénées aux pruneaux has 71% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Tourte au riesling has 53% more protein (12 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Tourte au riesling has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Tourte des Pyrénées aux pruneaux lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Tourte au riesling

Not available.

Tourte des Pyrénées aux pruneaux

Farine de blé, oeufs, sucre, pruneaux 13%, beurre (lait), huile de tournesol, humectant : glycérol, sirop de sucre inverti, rhum, eau, poudres à lever : diphosphate disodique, bicarbonate de sodium, émulsifiant: mono et di-glycérides d'acides gras, amidon de blé, huile de palme, sel, arôme naturel, épaississant : gomme xanthane, conservateur : sorbate de potassium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tourte au riesling or Tourte des Pyrénées aux pruneaux?

Overall, Tourte au riesling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tourte au riesling has fewer calories: 283 kcal versus 401 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tourte au riesling has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 27.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons