Comparison

Touch Of Strawberry Sugar Free vs Vitamin water: Apple & Elderflower

Overall, Touch Of Strawberry Sugar Free has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTouch Of Strawberry Sugar Fr...Vitamin water: Apple & Elder...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 1 kcal 7 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 1.1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 0.1 g
Additives43
AllergensNone listedApple

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Touch Of Strawberry Sugar Free has 86% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 7 kcal).
  • Touch Of Strawberry Sugar Free has no sugar, while Vitamin water: Apple & Elderflower has 1.1 g.
  • Only Vitamin water: Apple & Elderflower lists: Apple.

Ingredients

Touch Of Strawberry Sugar Free

Volvic Natural Mineral Water, Citric Acid, Natural Strawberry Flavouring with Other Natural Flavourings, Potassium Benzoate, Sucralose, Acesulfame K.

Vitamin water: Apple & Elderflower

spring water, 13% apple juice from concentrate, acid: citric acid: mate extract, natural flavourings, stabiliser: acacia gum, 0,025% l-carnitine, colour: copper chrolophyllins, sweetener: sucralose, vitamin c, niacin, pantothenic acid, vitamin b6, thiamin, folic acid, biotin, vitamin b12, fruit and vegetable concentrates (apple, carrot, hibiscus, safflower, lemon), molasses,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Touch Of Strawberry Sugar Free or Vitamin water: Apple & Elderflower?

Overall, Touch Of Strawberry Sugar Free has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Touch Of Strawberry Sugar Free has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Touch Of Strawberry Sugar Free has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons