Comparison

Torrone tenero alle mandorle ricoperto al gusto di arancia vs Turrón a la piedra

Overall, Turrón a la piedra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTorrone tenero alle mandorle...Turrón a la piedra
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 472 kcal 516 kcal
Fat 22 g 28 g
Saturated fat 9.3 g 2.4 g
Sugars 59 g 51 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 3.1 g —
Protein 6.4 g 12 g
Additives10
AllergensEggs, Milk, NutsNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Torrone tenero alle mandorle ricoperto al gusto di arancia has 21% less fat (22 g vs 28 g).
  • Turrón a la piedra has 74% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Turrón a la piedra has 14% less sugar (51 g vs 59 g).
  • Turrón a la piedra has 47% more protein (12 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Only Torrone tenero alle mandorle ricoperto al gusto di arancia lists: Eggs, Milk.

Ingredients

Torrone tenero alle mandorle ricoperto al gusto di arancia

Mandorle 30%, zucchero, sciroppo di glucosio, sciroppo di zucchero invertito, miele, amido di tapioca, albume d'uovo in polvere, vanillina, aromi, grassi vegetali (palmisti), latte scremato in polvere, lattosio, emulsionante, lecitina di girasole (E322), olio essenziale di arancia.

Turrón a la piedra

_Almendras_ tostadas 49%, azúcar, raspadura de limón, jarabe de glucosa, canela 0.2%, aromas.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Torrone tenero alle mandorle ricoperto al gusto di arancia or Turrón a la piedra?

Overall, Turrón a la piedra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Torrone tenero alle mandorle ricoperto al gusto di arancia has fewer calories: 472 kcal versus 516 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Turrón a la piedra has less sugar: 51 g versus 59 g per 100 g.

More comparisons