Tomme de chèvre vs Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)
Overall, Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Tomme de chèvre
Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomme de chèvre | Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 375 kcal | 35 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 91% fewer calories (35 kcal vs 375 kcal).
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 99% less fat (0.2 g vs 31 g).
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 100% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 22 g).
- Tomme de chèvre has 90% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.9 g).
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Tomme de chèvre has 86% more protein (23 g vs 3.3 g).
- Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Tomme de chèvre
Not available.
Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)
Lait de brebis (85 %), lait de chèvre (15 %) pasteurisés, présure, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomme de chèvre or Flore di Macchia (31 % MG)?
Overall, Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Flore di Macchia (31 % MG) has fewer calories: 35 kcal versus 375 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomme de chèvre has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.