Toco Loco - Limun vs River rock vital
Overall, River rock vital has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Toco Loco - Limun | River rock vital |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 8 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 84.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- River rock vital has 98% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 354 kcal).
- River rock vital has 98% less sugar (1.8 g vs 84.7 g).
- River rock vital has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1.8 g).
- Toco Loco - Limun has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- River rock vital has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Toco Loco - Limun
Šećer, kiselina: limunska kiselina, regulator kiselosti: natrijev hidrogen karbonat, prirodne citrus arome, koncentrirani sok limuna (0,5%), zgušnjivač: E414, vitamini: L-askorbinska kiselina, nikotinamid, D-alfa-tokoferil acetat, kalcijev D-pantotenat, riboflavin, piridoksin-hidroklorid, tiamin-mononitrat, pteroilmonoglutaminska kiselina, D-biotin, cijanokobalamin.
River rock vital
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Toco Loco - Limun or River rock vital?
Overall, River rock vital has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
River rock vital has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
River rock vital has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 84.7 g per 100 g.