Comparison
River rock vital vs Zero
Overall, Zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | River rock vital | Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 8 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zero has 88% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 8 kcal).
- Zero has no sugar, while River rock vital has 1.8 g.
Ingredients
River rock vital
Not available.
Zero
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: River rock vital or Zero?
Overall, Zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Zero has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zero has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.