Tilsiter siivut vs Tilsiter
Overall, Tilsiter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tilsiter siivut | Tilsiter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 339 kcal | 88 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.9 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tilsiter has 74% fewer calories (88 kcal vs 339 kcal).
- Tilsiter has 73% less fat (7 g vs 26 g).
- Tilsiter has 75% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 17.9 g).
- Tilsiter has 76% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Tilsiter siivut has 75% more protein (25 g vs 6.3 g).
- Tilsiter has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tilsiter siivut
Pastöroitu maito (alkuperä: EU), suola, hapatteet, mikrobiologinen juoksete.
Tilsiter
Pasteurisierte Milch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen (enthalten Milch), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tilsiter siivut or Tilsiter?
Overall, Tilsiter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tilsiter has fewer calories: 88 kcal versus 339 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tilsiter has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.