Comparison
Tila vs Azucarera
Overall, Tila has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tila | Azucarera |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 95 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tila has 100% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 380 kcal).
- Tila has 100% less sugar (0.1 g vs 95 g).
Ingredients
Tila
Not available.
Azucarera
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tila or Azucarera?
Overall, Tila has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tila has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tila has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 95 g per 100 g.