Comparison
Azucarera vs Tila
Overall, Tila has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Azucarera | Tila |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 95 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tila has no calories, while Azucarera has 380 kcal.
- Tila has no sugar, while Azucarera has 95 g.
- Tila has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Azucarera
Not available.
Tila
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Azucarera or Tila?
Overall, Tila has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tila has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tila has less sugar: 0 g versus 95 g per 100 g.