TIGER Energy drink vs Sting Energy
Overall, TIGER Energy drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | TIGER Energy drink | Sting Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 6 | 9 |
| Allergens | None listed | Acesulfame Potassium |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- TIGER Energy drink has 25% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 28 kcal).
- TIGER Energy drink has 71% less sugar (4.9 g vs 17 g).
- TIGER Energy drink has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sting Energy lists: Acesulfame Potassium.
Ingredients
TIGER Energy drink
water, sugar/glucose-fructose syrup, acidity regulators: citric acid and sodium citrates, carbon dioxide, taurine (0,4%), aroma, caffeine (0,03%), inositol, colours: e 101 and e 150d, sweetener – sucralose, vitamins: niacin, pantothenic acid, b6 and b12,
Sting Energy
CARBONATED WATER, SUGAR, ACIDITY REGULATORS (330, 331), SEQUESTERANTS (452(1), 385),TAURINE, CAFFEINE (0.03%), PRESERVATIVES (211, 202), SWEETENERS (955, 950), INOSITOL, VITAMINS PREMIX. CONTAINS PERMITTED SYNTHETIC FOOD COLOUR (129) AND ADDED FLAVOUR (NATURAL AND NATURE IDENTICAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES)
FAQ
Which is healthier: TIGER Energy drink or Sting Energy?
Overall, TIGER Energy drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
TIGER Energy drink has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
TIGER Energy drink has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 17 g per 100 g.