Lucozade Energy Orange vs Sting Energy
Overall, Lucozade Energy Orange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lucozade Energy Orange | Sting Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 36 kcal | 28 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 17 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 9 | 9 |
| Allergens | None listed | Acesulfame Potassium |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sting Energy has 22% fewer calories (28 kcal vs 36 kcal).
- Lucozade Energy Orange has 74% less sugar (4.5 g vs 17 g).
- Lucozade Energy Orange has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sting Energy lists: Acesulfame Potassium.
Ingredients
Lucozade Energy Orange
Carbonated Water, Glucose Syrup (11%), Orange Juice from Concentrate (6%), Acid (Citric Acid), Acidity Regulator (Sodium Gluconate), Flavourings, Preservative (Potassium Sorbate), Sweeteners (Sucralose, Acesulfame K), Stabiliser (Acacia Gum), Caffeine, Antioxidant (Ascorbic Acid), Niacin (Vitamin B3), Colour (Beta Carotene).
Sting Energy
CARBONATED WATER, SUGAR, ACIDITY REGULATORS (330, 331), SEQUESTERANTS (452(1), 385),TAURINE, CAFFEINE (0.03%), PRESERVATIVES (211, 202), SWEETENERS (955, 950), INOSITOL, VITAMINS PREMIX. CONTAINS PERMITTED SYNTHETIC FOOD COLOUR (129) AND ADDED FLAVOUR (NATURAL AND NATURE IDENTICAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lucozade Energy Orange or Sting Energy?
Overall, Lucozade Energy Orange has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sting Energy has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 36 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lucozade Energy Orange has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 17 g per 100 g.