Tielles de Sète vs Tielles à la Sétoise
Overall, Tielles de Sète has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tielles de Sète
Tielles à la Sétoise
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tielles de Sète | Tielles à la Sétoise |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 272 kcal | 297 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Molluscs | Gluten, Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tielles de Sète has 12% less fat (15 g vs 17 g).
- Tielles de Sète has 67% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.8 g).
- Tielles à la Sétoise has 19% less sugar (3.4 g vs 4.2 g).
- Tielles de Sète has 27% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tielles de Sète has 30% more fiber (3.4 g vs 2.4 g).
- Tielles de Sète has 16% more protein (8.6 g vs 7.2 g).
- Tielles de Sète has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tielles de Sète
Farine de _blé_, eau, _encornets_, huile de tournesol, double concentré de tomate, pulpe d'ail (ail, sel), sel, tomate concassée (acidifiant : acide citrique), oignon, levure, épices, thym.
Tielles à la Sétoise
Farine de blé, encornets géants 22 %, eau, huile de colza, double concentré de tomates 8,2 %, ail, sel, levure, plantes aromatiques, poivre, piment. Traces de : céleri, crustacés, lait, œufs et poissons.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tielles de Sète or Tielles à la Sétoise?
Overall, Tielles de Sète has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tielles de Sète has fewer calories: 272 kcal versus 297 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tielles à la Sétoise has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.