Test nutriscan vs Test
Overall, Test nutriscan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Test nutriscan | Test |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 61 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 11 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Test nutriscan has 45% fewer calories (61 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Test nutriscan has 91% less fat (1 g vs 11 g).
- Test nutriscan has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Test has no salt, while Test nutriscan has 1.1 g.
- Only Test nutriscan lists: Gluten, Milk, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Test nutriscan
farine de cinq céréales 75% (blé, avoine, seigle, orge, épeautre), huile de tournesol, graines de sésame 12%, lait écrémé en poudre, levure, sel de cuisine, extrait de malt d'orge, germes de blé 1%, poudres à lever: E 500, E 503, vitamines: B1, B2, B6, niacine et acide folique.
Test
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Test nutriscan or Test?
Overall, Test nutriscan has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Test nutriscan has fewer calories: 61 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Test nutriscan has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.