Comparison
Test vs Poulet
Overall, Poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Test | Poulet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 111 kcal | 110 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 23.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poulet has 86% less fat (1.5 g vs 11 g).
- Poulet has 56% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Poulet has no sugar, while Test has 1 g.
- Poulet has 53% more protein (23.4 g vs 11 g).
Ingredients
Test
Not available.
Poulet
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Test or Poulet?
Overall, Poulet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poulet has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Poulet has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.