Comparison

Terrine forestière essentiel vs Rillettes de volaille

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine forestière essentielRillettes de volaille
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 253 kcal 333 kcal
Fat 19 g 29 g
Saturated fat 6.3 g 8.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0.6 g —
Protein 17 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Terrine forestière essentiel has 24% fewer calories (253 kcal vs 333 kcal).
  • Terrine forestière essentiel has 34% less fat (19 g vs 29 g).
  • Terrine forestière essentiel has 28% less saturated fat (6.3 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Rillettes de volaille has no sugar, while Terrine forestière essentiel has 0.5 g.
  • Rillettes de volaille has 31% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Rillettes de volaille is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Rillettes de volaille lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Terrine forestière essentiel

Viande de porc, lard, foie de poulet 18%, champignons 5% (oreilles de Judas, bolets, cornes d'abondance), sel de cuisine, bouillons de légumes (jus concentrẻ de côtes de bette, jus concentré de carottes), épices, plantes aromatiques, arôme naturel, fécule de pommes de terre, jus concentré d'acérola.

Rillettes de volaille

Viande de volaille du Mesnil (59%) avec son bouillon (eau, poireaux, carottes, thym, laurier), graisse de canard (27%), sel, poivre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine forestière essentiel or Rillettes de volaille?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Terrine forestière essentiel has fewer calories: 253 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rillettes de volaille has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons