Comparison

Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon vs La terrine de dinde au marrons

Overall, Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine de dinde au poivre v...La terrine de dinde au marro...
Nutri-Score a e
NOVA group — —
Calories 155 kcal 316 kcal
Fat 7.7 g 27 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 9.9 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.8 g
Protein 19.6 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has 51% fewer calories (155 kcal vs 316 kcal).
  • Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has 72% less fat (7.7 g vs 27 g).
  • Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has 73% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 9.9 g).
  • Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has 88% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has 48% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has 34% more protein (19.6 g vs 13 g).
  • Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon

Not available.

La terrine de dinde au marrons

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon or La terrine de dinde au marrons?

Overall, Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has fewer calories: 155 kcal versus 316 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terrine de dinde au poivre vert et champignon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons