Comparison

Terrine de cerf au cognac vs Terrine de canard au poivre vert

Overall, Terrine de cerf au cognac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine de cerf au cognacTerrine de canard au poivre...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 202 kcal 257 kcal
Fat 14 g 21 g
Saturated fat 5.5 g 7.9 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.7 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.4 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 16 g 15 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Terrine de cerf au cognac has 21% fewer calories (202 kcal vs 257 kcal).
  • Terrine de cerf au cognac has 33% less fat (14 g vs 21 g).
  • Terrine de cerf au cognac has 30% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Only Terrine de canard au poivre vert lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Terrine de cerf au cognac

Gras de porc, foie de porc, viande de cerf 20% (origine : UE), eau, gorge de porc (origine : France), amidon modifié de pomme de terre, sel, épices, plantes aromatiques, cognac 1%, arômes, dextrose.

Terrine de canard au poivre vert

Viande de canard 25%, foie de dinde, viande de porc 22%, gras de porc, couenne de porc, oignons, farine et amidon de _blé_, sel, poivre vert 1%, Armagnac, _lactose_, protéines de _lait_, épices, dextrose, arômes naturels. Origine : Cette terrine est élaborée en Bretagne à partir de porc, de canard et de dinde d'origine France.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine de cerf au cognac or Terrine de canard au poivre vert?

Overall, Terrine de cerf au cognac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Terrine de cerf au cognac has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terrine de canard au poivre vert has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons