Tartine emmental lardons vs Cheesy Garlic
Overall, Cheesy Garlic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tartine emmental lardons | Cheesy Garlic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 254 kcal | 258 kcal |
| Fat | 9.2 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 14 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 14 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 8.9 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tartine emmental lardons has 23% less fat (9.2 g vs 12 g).
- Cheesy Garlic has 18% less saturated fat (4 g vs 4.9 g).
- Tartine emmental lardons has 83% less sugar (2.4 g vs 14 g).
- Cheesy Garlic has 35% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Cheesy Garlic has 78% more fiber (14 g vs 3.1 g).
- Tartine emmental lardons has 26% more protein (12 g vs 8.9 g).
- Cheesy Garlic has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tartine emmental lardons lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Tartine emmental lardons
Farine de BLE, eau, sauce tomate (tomates, eau, amidon, sel, sucre, huile de tournesol, basilic, poivre, thym), emmental 12% (LAIT), lardons fumés 12% (poitrine de porc (origine: UE), sel, dextrose, arôme de fumée, acidifiant : E330, antioxydant: E316, conservateur: E250), sel, levure, farine de BLE malté, agent de traitement de la farine : E300.
Cheesy Garlic
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tartine emmental lardons or Cheesy Garlic?
Overall, Cheesy Garlic has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tartine emmental lardons has fewer calories: 254 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tartine emmental lardons has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 14 g per 100 g.