Comparison

Tartinables confit de tomates séchées vs Vqr cfr 8p

Overall, Vqr cfr 8p has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTartinables confit de tomate...Vqr cfr 8p
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 428 kcal 260 kcal
Fat 40 g 22 g
Saturated fat 6 g 13.5 g
Sugars 7 g 6 g
Salt 3.8 g 4.5 g
Fiber 4.1 g —
Protein 2 g 13.3 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Vqr cfr 8p has 39% fewer calories (260 kcal vs 428 kcal).
  • Vqr cfr 8p has 45% less fat (22 g vs 40 g).
  • Tartinables confit de tomates séchées has 56% less saturated fat (6 g vs 13.5 g).
  • Vqr cfr 8p has 14% less sugar (6 g vs 7 g).
  • Tartinables confit de tomates séchées has 16% less salt (3.8 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Vqr cfr 8p has 85% more protein (13.3 g vs 2 g).
  • Only Vqr cfr 8p lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Tartinables confit de tomates séchées

Tomates séchées réhydratées 34% (tomates séchées, eau, vinaigre de vin), pulpe de tomates 34%, huile de tournesol, basilic, vinaigre de vin, sel, tomate déshydratée, huile d'olive vierge extra, Peut contenir des traces de lait et de fruits à coque.

Vqr cfr 8p

lait écrémé réhydraté, fromage fondu, matière grasse laitière, matières grasses végétales, protéines de lait, sels de fonte (E452, E339), sel, arôme naturel (MANDARINE ORANGE), colorant (E160c), arôme naturel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tartinables confit de tomates séchées or Vqr cfr 8p?

Overall, Vqr cfr 8p has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Vqr cfr 8p has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 428 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vqr cfr 8p has less sugar: 6 g versus 7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons