Comparison

Sweet popcorn classic caramel vs Caramel micro popcorn

Overall, Caramel micro popcorn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSweet popcorn classic carame...Caramel micro popcorn
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 413 kcal 446 kcal
Fat 7.5 g 15 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 3.8 g
Sugars 52 g 13 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 7.1 g 11 g
Protein 4.5 g 8.2 g
Additives24
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sweet popcorn classic caramel has 50% less fat (7.5 g vs 15 g).
  • Sweet popcorn classic caramel has 68% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Caramel micro popcorn has 75% less sugar (13 g vs 52 g).
  • Caramel micro popcorn has 35% more fiber (11 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Caramel micro popcorn has 45% more protein (8.2 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Caramel micro popcorn has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sweet popcorn classic caramel

50% de grains de maïs, 36 % de sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, huiles végétales (tournesol, colza en proportion variable), émulsifiant : lécithine,

Caramel micro popcorn

Царевица за пуканки (68,14%), захар, слънчогледово олио, декстроза, емулгатори (моно - и диглицериди на мастни киселини, лецитин), естествен Пароматизант, антиоксидант (екстракт от розмарин), оцветители (екстракт от паприка, бета-каротин), карамел на прах (0,01%).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sweet popcorn classic caramel or Caramel micro popcorn?

Overall, Caramel micro popcorn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sweet popcorn classic caramel has fewer calories: 413 kcal versus 446 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Caramel micro popcorn has less sugar: 13 g versus 52 g per 100 g.

More comparisons