Comparison

Super Mass Gainer vs Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana

Overall, Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSuper Mass GainerWild Protein Pro Barra Sabor...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 338 kcal 387 kcal
Fat 7 g 12.1 g
Saturated fat 4 g 3.8 g
Sugars 26 g 0 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 31 g 35 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Super Mass Gainer has 13% fewer calories (338 kcal vs 387 kcal).
  • Super Mass Gainer has 42% less fat (7 g vs 12.1 g).
  • Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana has no sugar, while Super Mass Gainer has 26 g.
  • Super Mass Gainer has 65% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana has 11% more protein (35 g vs 31 g).
  • Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Super Mass Gainer

Not available.

Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana

Pasta de dátil (22%), proteína aislada de soya, fibra de achicoria, proteína aislada de suero de leche, pasta de avellana (9%), licor de cacao (9%), cacao en polvo, almidón de tapioca, saborizante idéntico al natural.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Super Mass Gainer or Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana?

Overall, Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Super Mass Gainer has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wild Protein Pro Barra Sabor Chocolate Avellana has less sugar: 0 g versus 26 g per 100 g.

More comparisons