Comparison

Sultaninen vs Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich

Overall, Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSultaninenSchwarze Johannesbeere Fruch...
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 318 kcal 192 kcal
Fat 0.6 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0 g
Sugars 69 g 43 g
Salt 0.1 g —
Protein 2.5 g 0.7 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich has 40% fewer calories (192 kcal vs 318 kcal).
  • Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich has no fat, while Sultaninen has 0.6 g.
  • Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich has 38% less sugar (43 g vs 69 g).
  • Sultaninen has 72% more protein (2.5 g vs 0.7 g).

Ingredients

Sultaninen

O O Sultaninen : Sultaninen, Baumwollsaatöl. Unter Schutzatmosphäre verpackt. Vor Wärme und Feuchtigkeit geschützt auft Mindestens haltbar bis Ende: siehe unten. OO Raisins secs sultanines Ingrédients: raisins sultanines séchés, hui Sondit orotectrice.

Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich

Schwarze Johannisbeeren (50%), Zucker, Geliermittel: Pektin. VEGAN. Nach dem Öffnen im Kühlschrank aufbewahren. Innerhalb weniger Tage verzehren. Zuegg Deutschland GmbH Durchsch Emerge Fett davon davon b Betriebsstätte 06780 Zörbig - Deutschland. 4 013034 740411

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sultaninen or Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich?

Overall, Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich has fewer calories: 192 kcal versus 318 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Schwarze Johannesbeere Fruchtaufstrich has less sugar: 43 g versus 69 g per 100 g.

More comparisons