Comparison

Sugo all'amatriciana vs Amatriciana sugo

Overall, Sugo all'amatriciana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSugo all'amatricianaAmatriciana sugo
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — —
Calories 106 kcal 163 kcal
Fat 6.3 g 13 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 4.3 g
Sugars 4.7 g 6.5 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.5 g
Fiber 1.2 g —
Protein 4.5 g 3.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sugo all'amatriciana has 35% fewer calories (106 kcal vs 163 kcal).
  • Sugo all'amatriciana has 52% less fat (6.3 g vs 13 g).
  • Sugo all'amatriciana has 60% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Sugo all'amatriciana has 28% less sugar (4.7 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Sugo all'amatriciana has 27% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Sugo all'amatriciana has 22% more protein (4.5 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Sugo all'amatriciana has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sugo all'amatriciana

Not available.

Amatriciana sugo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sugo all'amatriciana or Amatriciana sugo?

Overall, Sugo all'amatriciana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sugo all'amatriciana has fewer calories: 106 kcal versus 163 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sugo all'amatriciana has less sugar: 4.7 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons