Comparison
Sucrine Salade croquante vs Sucrine verte
Overall, Sucrine Salade croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sucrine Salade croquante | Sucrine verte |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | — |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sucrine Salade croquante has 45% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 20 kcal).
- Sucrine Salade croquante has 30% less sugar (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Sucrine verte has 20% more protein (1.5 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Sucrine Salade croquante
Sucrine
Sucrine verte
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sucrine Salade croquante or Sucrine verte?
Overall, Sucrine Salade croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sucrine Salade croquante has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sucrine Salade croquante has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 2 g per 100 g.