Comparison

Sucre de coco vs Zucchero di canna integrale

Overall, Sucre de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSucre de cocoZucchero di canna integrale
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 2 —
Calories 387 kcal 386 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 90 g 94 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1 g 0 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sucre de coco has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Sucre de coco

100 % sucre de fleur de noix de coco* (Cocos Nucifera) *Issu de l'Agriculture Biologique.

Zucchero di canna integrale

ZUCCHERO DI CANNA INTEGRALE biologico-organic Dichiarazione nutrizionale: valori medi per / Nutrition declaration per: Déclaration nutritionnelle pour: Nährwertdeklaration pro: /Voedingswaardevermelding voor:/ Información nutricional por Energia/Energy/Energie/Energie Energie/Valor energético Grassi Fat Graisses/Fett/Vetten/Grasas - di cui acidi grassi saturi/of which: saturates/ dont: acides gras saturés/davon: gesättigte Fettsäuren/waarvan: verzadigde vetzuren/ de las cuales: ácidos grasos saturados Carboidrati/Carbohydrate/Glucides/ Kohlenhydrate/Koolhydraten/Hidratos de carbono 100g kJ 1639 kcal 386 Og Og 96 g 94g -

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sucre de coco or Zucchero di canna integrale?

Overall, Sucre de coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Zucchero di canna integrale has fewer calories: 386 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sucre de coco has less sugar: 90 g versus 94 g per 100 g.

More comparisons