Suco de Uva vs Rote Traube mit stillem Wasser
Overall, Rote Traube mit stillem Wasser has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Suco de Uva | Rote Traube mit stillem Wass... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 38 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rote Traube mit stillem Wasser has 37% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 60 kcal).
- Rote Traube mit stillem Wasser has 40% less sugar (9 g vs 15 g).
- Suco de Uva has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Suco de Uva
Suco de uva tinto integral, conservante INS 202, antioxidante INS 220.
Rote Traube mit stillem Wasser
druivensap, water
FAQ
Which is healthier: Suco de Uva or Rote Traube mit stillem Wasser?
Overall, Rote Traube mit stillem Wasser has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rote Traube mit stillem Wasser has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rote Traube mit stillem Wasser has less sugar: 9 g versus 15 g per 100 g.