Comparison

Succulent chicken stock pot vs Chicken Stock Pot

Overall, Chicken Stock Pot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSucculent chicken stock potChicken Stock Pot
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 177 kcal 92 kcal
Fat 6.1 g 4 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 1.6 g
Sugars 7 g 6.6 g
Salt 19.4 g 15.2 g
Fiber 2.7 g 1 g
Protein 4.7 g 4.1 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedChicken

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chicken Stock Pot has 48% fewer calories (92 kcal vs 177 kcal).
  • Chicken Stock Pot has 34% less fat (4 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Chicken Stock Pot has 30% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Chicken Stock Pot has 21% less salt (15.2 g vs 19.4 g).
  • Succulent chicken stock pot has 63% more fiber (2.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Succulent chicken stock pot has 13% more protein (4.7 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Only Chicken Stock Pot lists: Chicken.

Ingredients

Succulent chicken stock pot

Not available.

Chicken Stock Pot

Concentrated chicken stock (63%) (water, chicken), salt, sugar, flavourings, yeast extract, chicken fat (2%) potassium chloride, palm fat, gelling agents (xanthan gum, locust bean gum), garlic (0.4%), carrots*, leek* (0.1%), caramel syrup, maltodextrin, parsley* (0.1%), carrot juice concentrate*, antioxidant (extracts of rosemary), colour (carotenes). *From sustainable agriculture.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Succulent chicken stock pot or Chicken Stock Pot?

Overall, Chicken Stock Pot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chicken Stock Pot has fewer calories: 92 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chicken Stock Pot has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons