Succo di ananas vs Zumo concentrado de piña sin gluten
Overall, Zumo concentrado de piña sin gluten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Succo di ananas | Zumo concentrado de piña sin... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 47 kcal | 52 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.6 g | 9.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zumo concentrado de piña sin gluten has 57% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.6 g).
- Zumo concentrado de piña sin gluten has the better Nutri-Score.
- Zumo concentrado de piña sin gluten is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Succo di ananas
Succo di ananas da concentrato, stabilizzante: pectina, antiossidante: acido ascorbico.
Zumo concentrado de piña sin gluten
Zumo de piña a partir de concentrado
FAQ
Which is healthier: Succo di ananas or Zumo concentrado de piña sin gluten?
Overall, Zumo concentrado de piña sin gluten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Succo di ananas has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zumo concentrado de piña sin gluten has less sugar: 9.9 g versus 10.6 g per 100 g.