Storck Werther's original 50g vs Fruits caramelos blandos
Overall, Fruits caramelos blandos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Storck Werther's original 50g
Fruits caramelos blandos
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Storck Werther's original 50... | Fruits caramelos blandos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 424 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 71.6 g | 70 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruits caramelos blandos has 21% less fat (6.6 g vs 8.4 g).
- Fruits caramelos blandos has 32% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 5.7 g).
- Fruits caramelos blandos has no salt, while Storck Werther's original 50g has 1 g.
- Fruits caramelos blandos has 63% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.3 g).
- Only Storck Werther's original 50g lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Storck Werther's original 50g
4014 4016 es0g AL 09,2024 FE 48M
Fruits caramelos blandos
Azúcar, jarabe de glucosa, grasa vegetal (palma), gelatina, acidulante (ácido cítrico), aromas (limón, naranja, cereza, fresa, piña), zumo de frutas concentrado 0,3% (limón, naranja, cereza, fresa, piña), colorantes (E100, E160c), zumo concentrado de granos de saúco, emulgente (lecitina de girasol).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Storck Werther's original 50g or Fruits caramelos blandos?
Overall, Fruits caramelos blandos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruits caramelos blandos has fewer calories: 400 kcal versus 424 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruits caramelos blandos has less sugar: 70 g versus 71.6 g per 100 g.