Caramelos de nata vs Fruits caramelos blandos
Overall, Fruits caramelos blandos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caramelos de nata | Fruits caramelos blandos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 458 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 63 g | 70 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 6 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruits caramelos blandos has 13% fewer calories (400 kcal vs 458 kcal).
- Fruits caramelos blandos has 49% less fat (6.6 g vs 13 g).
- Fruits caramelos blandos has 57% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 9 g).
- Caramelos de nata has 10% less sugar (63 g vs 70 g).
- Caramelos de nata has 64% more protein (2.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Caramelos de nata lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Caramelos de nata
Jarabe de glucosa, azúcar, grasa vegetal de palma, leche en polvo, jarabe de caña de azúcar, aromas, emulgentes (lecitina de soja y E-471) y sal.
Fruits caramelos blandos
Azúcar, jarabe de glucosa, grasa vegetal (palma), gelatina, acidulante (ácido cítrico), aromas (limón, naranja, cereza, fresa, piña), zumo de frutas concentrado 0,3% (limón, naranja, cereza, fresa, piña), colorantes (E100, E160c), zumo concentrado de granos de saúco, emulgente (lecitina de girasol).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caramelos de nata or Fruits caramelos blandos?
Overall, Fruits caramelos blandos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruits caramelos blandos has fewer calories: 400 kcal versus 458 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caramelos de nata has less sugar: 63 g versus 70 g per 100 g.