Comparison
Stones Maracuyá vs Golden Lager
Overall, Golden Lager has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Stones Maracuyá | Golden Lager |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 38 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Golden Lager has 24% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 50 kcal).
- Only Golden Lager lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Stones Maracuyá
Not available.
Golden Lager
Agua, malta de cebada, lúpulo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Stones Maracuyá or Golden Lager?
Overall, Golden Lager has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Golden Lager has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Stones Maracuyá has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.