Comparison
Golden Lager vs Lager Sin Alcohol
Overall, Lager Sin Alcohol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Golden Lager | Lager Sin Alcohol |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lager Sin Alcohol has 45% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 38 kcal).
- Golden Lager has no sugar, while Lager Sin Alcohol has 3.3 g.
- Lager Sin Alcohol has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Only Golden Lager lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Golden Lager
Agua, malta de cebada, lúpulo
Lager Sin Alcohol
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Golden Lager or Lager Sin Alcohol?
Overall, Lager Sin Alcohol has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lager Sin Alcohol has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Golden Lager has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Coors Original BEER vs Lager Sin Alcohol
Quilmes Clásica vs Lager Sin Alcohol
Weissbier Munich Wheat B... vs Lager Sin Alcohol
Stones Mango vs Lager Sin Alcohol
Super Bock vs Lager Sin Alcohol
Weissbier Munich Wheat B... vs Golden Lager
Coors Original BEER vs Golden Lager
Quilmes Clásica vs Golden Lager