Comparison

Stones Mango vs Cerveza Cero Parque Forestal

Overall, Stones Mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 ml

Nutrient	Stones Mango	Cerveza Cero Parque Forestal
Nutri-Score	a	b
NOVA group	—	1
Calories	50 kcal	33 kcal
Fat	0 g	0 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0 g
Sugars	0 g	3.5 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	0 g	0.9 g
Additives	0	1
Allergens	None listed	Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Cerveza Cero Parque Forestal has 34% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 50 kcal).
Stones Mango has no sugar, while Cerveza Cero Parque Forestal has 3.5 g.
Cerveza Cero Parque Forestal has 100% more protein (0.9 g vs 0 g).
Stones Mango has the better Nutri-Score.
Only Cerveza Cero Parque Forestal lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Stones Mango

No visible

Cerveza Cero Parque Forestal

Agua, Malta de cebada, lúpulo, levadura, Benzoato de sodio. Contiene gluten. Alcohol <0,5° G.L.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Stones Mango or Cerveza Cero Parque Forestal?

Overall, Stones Mango has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cerveza Cero Parque Forestal has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Stones Mango has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Weissbier Munich Wheat B... vs Stones Mango Coors Original BEER vs Stones Mango Weissbier Munich Wheat B... vs Cerveza Cero Parque Fore... Coors Original BEER vs Cerveza Cero Parque Fore... Quilmes Clásica vs Cerveza Cero Parque Fore... Golden Lager vs Cerveza Cero Parque Fore... Super Bock vs Cerveza Cero Parque Fore... Stones Maracuyá vs Cerveza Cero Parque Fore...