Comparison

Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer vs Stones Mango

Overall, Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice
Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer

Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer

Paulaner · 500 ml
NOVA 3
Stones Mango

Stones Mango

Stones · 2.5 L
a

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientWeissbier Munich Wheat BeerStones Mango
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 42 kcal 50 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer has 16% fewer calories (42 kcal vs 50 kcal).
  • Only Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer

agua, malta de trigo, malta de cebada, levadura, lúpulo, alcohol

Stones Mango

No visible

FAQ

Which is healthier: Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer or Stones Mango?

Overall, Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Weissbier Munich Wheat Beer has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Quilmes Clásica vs Stones Mango Super Bock vs Stones Mango Weissbier Munich Wheat B... vs Coors Original BEER Weissbier Munich Wheat B... vs Quilmes Clásica Weissbier Munich Wheat B... vs Super Bock Weissbier Munich Wheat B... vs Lager Sin Alcohol Coors Original BEER vs Stones Mango Stones Mango vs Lager Sin Alcohol