Comparison

St hubert 41 250 g doux ss hdp vs Lätta original

Overall, Lätta original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSt hubert 41 250 g doux ss h...Lätta original
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 392 kcal 338 kcal
Fat 41 g 37 g
Saturated fat 19 g 13 g
Sugars 2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.5 g
Protein 1.3 g 0 g
Additives87
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lätta original has 14% fewer calories (338 kcal vs 392 kcal).
  • Lätta original has 32% less saturated fat (13 g vs 19 g).
  • Lätta original has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • St hubert 41 250 g doux ss hdp has 100% more protein (1.3 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

St hubert 41 250 g doux ss hdp

Babeurre (LAIT), huiles et stéarine végétales 36% (colza, coco, karité), LAIT écrémé réhydraté, eau, BEURRE concentré 3%, épaississant (E1422), émulsifiants (mono et diglycérides d'acide gras, E476), sel, correcteurs d'acidité (E331), acide lactique), arômes (LAIT), conservateur (sorbate de potassium), colorant (bêta-carotène).

Lätta original

Eau, huiles et graisses végétales (palme, karité, tournesol), 17% huile de colza, 10% babeurre, amidon modifié, sel comestible (0.5%), émulsifiant (mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras, lécithine), agent conservateur (sorbate de potassium), acidifiant (acide lactique), arôme naturel, vitamines (a, d), colorant (caroténoides)

FAQ

Which is healthier: St hubert 41 250 g doux ss hdp or Lätta original?

Overall, Lätta original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lätta original has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lätta original has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons