Comparison
Spitfire vs Höga kusten
Overall, Spitfire has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Spitfire | Höga kusten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Spitfire has 18% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Only Höga kusten lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Spitfire
ale beer
Höga kusten
Vatten, KORNMALT, humle
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spitfire or Höga kusten?
Overall, Spitfire has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Spitfire has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Spitfire has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.