Comparison
Pelfort brune vs Höga kusten
Overall, Höga kusten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Pelfort brune | Höga kusten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 61 kcal | 45 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Höga kusten has 26% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 61 kcal).
Ingredients
Pelfort brune
Eau, malt d'orge, caramel aromatique, extraits de houblon.
Höga kusten
Vatten, KORNMALT, humle
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pelfort brune or Höga kusten?
Overall, Höga kusten has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Höga kusten has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Höga kusten has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.