Spearmint vs Mentos Kaudragees Big Pack - Fruit
Overall, Spearmint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Spearmint | Mentos Kaudragees Big Pack -... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 398 kcal | 388 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 92.2 g | 69 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 6 | 9 |
| Allergens | None listed | Orange |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Spearmint has 68% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.9 g).
- Spearmint has 65% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.7 g).
- Mentos Kaudragees Big Pack - Fruit has 25% less sugar (69 g vs 92.2 g).
- Only Mentos Kaudragees Big Pack - Fruit lists: Orange.
Ingredients
Spearmint
Zucker, Maltodextrin, Verdickungsmittel Gummi arabicum, Fruktose, Reisstärke, Aromen, Trennmittel Magnesiumsalze der Speisefettsäuren, Überzugsmittel Carnaubawachs, Spirulinakonzentrat, Farbstoffe: Kurkumin, Chlorophyll.
Mentos Kaudragees Big Pack - Fruit
Zucker, Glukosesirup, Fruchtsäfte (Erdbeere, Orange, Zitrone) (2%), Kokosöl, Säuerungsmittel (Citronensäure), Stärke, Kakaobutter, Aromen, Maltodextrin, Verdickungsmittel (Gellan, Cellulosegummi, Gummi arabicum), Emulgator (Zuckerester von Speisefettsäuren), Überzugsmittel (Carnaubawachs), Farbstoffe (Beta-Carotin, Betenrot).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spearmint or Mentos Kaudragees Big Pack - Fruit?
Overall, Spearmint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mentos Kaudragees Big Pack - Fruit has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 398 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mentos Kaudragees Big Pack - Fruit has less sugar: 69 g versus 92.2 g per 100 g.