Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken vs Natureo Syrah -
Overall, Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Spatburgunder 2022 trocken f... | Natureo Syrah - |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 32 kcal |
| Fat | — | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Natureo Syrah - has 40% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 53 kcal).
- Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has 72% less sugar (1 g vs 3.6 g).
- Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has 100% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0 g).
- Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has 100% more protein (1.2 g vs 0 g).
- Only Natureo Syrah - lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken
Not available.
Natureo Syrah -
Dealcoholized wine Dimethyl dicarbonate Sulfur dioxide Contains: Sulphites " . Ingredients: Vin désalcoolisé Dicarbonate de dimethyl Dioxide de soufre Contient: Sulfites
FAQ
Which is healthier: Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken or Natureo Syrah -?
Overall, Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Natureo Syrah - has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Spatburgunder 2022 trocken franken has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.