Sparkling British Apple vs Apfelschorle bio
Overall, Apfelschorle bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sparkling British Apple | Apfelschorle bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 30 kcal | 23 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 7.6 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apfelschorle bio has 23% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 30 kcal).
- Sparkling British Apple has 94% less fat (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Apfelschorle bio has 30% less sugar (5.3 g vs 7.6 g).
- Apfelschorle bio has 94% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Apfelschorle bio has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sparkling British Apple
NO ARTIFICIAL SWEETENERS, COLOURS OR FLAVOURINGS M&S SPARKLING BRITISH APPLE CRISP & REFRESHING
Apfelschorle bio
Jus de pomme, eau pétillante, co2
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sparkling British Apple or Apfelschorle bio?
Overall, Apfelschorle bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apfelschorle bio has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Apfelschorle bio has less sugar: 5.3 g versus 7.6 g per 100 g.