Comparison

Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux vs Sorbet plein fruit Cassis 500G/750ml 2022

Overall, Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSorbet plein fruit Cassis av...Sorbet plein fruit Cassis 50...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 118 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.5 g
Sugars 24 g 25 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber 2 g 8.2 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.5 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux has 16% fewer calories (118 kcal vs 141 kcal).
  • Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux has 94% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Sorbet plein fruit Cassis 500G/750ml 2022 has 76% more fiber (8.2 g vs 2 g).

Ingredients

Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux

Cassis 46,6% (puréeet baies), eau, sucre, sirop de glucose, arôme naturel decassis, amidon stabilisants : gomme xanthane, gomme guar protéines de poishydrolysées. Traces éventuelles de lait et de fruits à coque.

Sorbet plein fruit Cassis 500G/750ml 2022

Cassis 50 %, eau, sucre, fibres de maïs, stabilisant (farine de graines de caroube), protéine de pomme de terre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux or Sorbet plein fruit Cassis 500G/750ml 2022?

Overall, Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sorbet plein fruit Cassis avec morceaux has less sugar: 24 g versus 25 g per 100 g.

More comparisons