Comparison

Sorbet Fou de cassis vs Sorbet plein fruit Cassis 500G/750ml 2022

Overall, Sorbet Fou de cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSorbet Fou de cassisSorbet plein fruit Cassis 50...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 123 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.5 g
Sugars 25 g 25 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber 1.1 g 8.2 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.5 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sorbet Fou de cassis has 13% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 141 kcal).
  • Sorbet Fou de cassis has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Sorbet Fou de cassis has 94% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Sorbet plein fruit Cassis 500G/750ml 2022 has 87% more fiber (8.2 g vs 1.1 g).

Ingredients

Sorbet Fou de cassis

Eau, purée de cassis 19,4%, sucre, jus de cassis à base de concentré 16,8% (eau, jus de cassis concentré), sirop de glucose en poudre, arôme naturel de cassis 0,6%, concentrés végétaux (patate douce, pomme, cerise, radis), stabilisants (gomme guar, farine de graines de caroube, pectines), protéines de pois hydrolysées, Produit élaboré dans un atelier qui utilise : lait, fruits à coque,

Sorbet plein fruit Cassis 500G/750ml 2022

Cassis 50 %, eau, sucre, fibres de maïs, stabilisant (farine de graines de caroube), protéine de pomme de terre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sorbet Fou de cassis or Sorbet plein fruit Cassis 500G/750ml 2022?

Overall, Sorbet Fou de cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sorbet Fou de cassis has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sorbet Fou de cassis has less sugar: 25 g versus 25 g per 100 g.

More comparisons