Somersby Cider - Blackberry vs Saft vom Fass ohne (20)
Overall, Saft vom Fass ohne (20) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Somersby Cider - Blackberry | Saft vom Fass ohne (20) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.8 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saft vom Fass ohne (20) has 72% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 65 kcal).
- Saft vom Fass ohne (20) has 46% less sugar (4.2 g vs 7.8 g).
Ingredients
Somersby Cider - Blackberry
Apfelwein (51%), Wasser, Zucker, Apfelsaft aus Apfelsaft-konzentrat, Kohlensäure, Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure, natürliches Aroma, Farbstoffe Anthozyane, E150c, Echtes Karmin
Saft vom Fass ohne (20)
Apfelwein, Apfelsaft (aus Konzentrat), Kohlensäure, Antioxidans E220 (enthält Sulfit), pasteurisiert
FAQ
Which is healthier: Somersby Cider - Blackberry or Saft vom Fass ohne (20)?
Overall, Saft vom Fass ohne (20) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Saft vom Fass ohne (20) has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 65 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saft vom Fass ohne (20) has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.