Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece vs Salchichas de pollo y pavo
Overall, Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece
Salchichas de pollo y pavo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece | Salchichas de pollo y pavo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 203 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 5.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 15.5 g | 13.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece has 19% less fat (13 g vs 16 g).
- Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece has 25% less saturated fat (4 g vs 5.3 g).
- Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece has 15% less salt (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece has 13% more protein (15.5 g vs 13.5 g).
Ingredients
Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece
Meat 90% (chicken meat 85%, veal meat 5%), potato starch, salt, aromas, spices, spice extracts
Salchichas de pollo y pavo
Carne separada mecánicamente de pollo (76%), agua, carne separada mecánicamente de pavo (7%, sal, dextrosa, fibra vegetal, estabilizador (E-450), aromas, extractos de especias, jarabe de glucosa, gelificante (E-466), concentrado de boniato, especias, aroma de humo, antioxidante (E-315) proteina vegetal hidrolizada, conservador (E-250),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece or Salchichas de pollo y pavo?
Overall, Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sokoliki drobiowo-cielece has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.