Comparison
Sok vs Sitronsaft Usukret, 115 ml
Overall, Sok has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Sok | Sitronsaft Usukret, 115 ml |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sok has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Sok has no sugar, while Sitronsaft Usukret, 115 ml has 2.4 g.
- Sitronsaft Usukret, 115 ml has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Sok
sok z cytryny 100%
Sitronsaft Usukret, 115 ml
Tiivisteestä valmistettu sitruunatäysmehu, sitruunaöljy, hapettumisenestoaine E 224: kaliumdisulfiitti.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sok or Sitronsaft Usukret, 115 ml?
Overall, Sok has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sok has fewer calories: 28 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sok has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.